At each wavelength, it is also possible to calculate the upward (transmitted), downward (scattered), and net flux for different positions along a vertical axis inside the leaf. As many as twenty virtual sensors were regularly positioned between the two epidermal layers. Each time a photon reached the upper surface of the sensor, the downward flux counter was incremented by 1; and conversely, the upward flux counter was incremented when a photon reached its lower surface. Photons collected in this manner were then divided by the total number of emitted photons to provide relative energy fluxes. For each sensor, the net flux was calculated as the difference between the downward and upward fluxes. Fig.2 illustrates the light gradients within the leaf at 675 nm. The distribution of light shows several notable features in accordance with experimental results obtained by [13] using a fibreoptic probe. For instance, these authors showed small rises in the profiles when a transition between two different tissues occurred; these rises, which were probably due to optical discontinuities, can be seen in Fig.2. The attenuation of transmitted light is exponential indicating significant amounts of absorption. 80% of the light is absorbed in the palissade, i.e., within the initial 90 um or so of the leaf. The reason why the relative downward flux in the upper epidermis is higher than 100% is that the same photon may be scattered several times inside an epidermal cell and then be counted more than once by a detector. This concentration of light has been already reported in the literature for various leaves [14]. Fig.2 also shows that the amount of scattered light falls to less than 10% of its initial level within the upper epidermis, as observed by [13].
The relationship between the hemispherical reflectance Rh, or transmittance Th, and the illumination zenith angle (IZA) assuming direct radiation has been also investigated. Results for 675 nm and 1000 nm are presented in Fig. 3. In the red, only Rh significantly varies with the IZA. In the NIR, both Rh and Th present a zenital dependence which is symmetric so that the hemispherical absorptance is constant. Using the Fresnel equations and an average refractive index of 1.45 characteristic of leaf material, [15] calculated the reflection of light by a dielectric surface in three dimensions and found similar results for Rsh. As the hemispherical single scattering reflection results only from the surface reflection, it should be also comparable with experimental measurements of the polarized reflectance of plant leaves such as those performed by [16]. Because Raytran ignores for the moment the effects of the cuticular waxes, of the leaf pubescence which may produce diffraction and increase Rh, our values are relatively low but still consistent.
Finally, we simulated the bidirectional reflectance and transmittance
for various IZA in the NIR (Fig.4). The
specular component for the reflectance increases as the IZA becomes higher
while the transmittance is rather Lambertian. These results agree with
observations [17], [18].
[2] W. A. Allen, H. W. Gausman and A. J. Richardson, "Willstatter-Stoll theory of leaf reflectance evaluated by ray tracing," Appl Opt., vol. 12, pp. 2448-2452, 1973.
[3] R. Kumar and L. Silva, "Light ray tracing through a leaf cross section," Appl. Opt., vol. 12, pp. 2950-2954, 1973.
[4] T. W. Brakke and J. A. Smith, "A ray tracing model for leaf bidirectional scattering steadies," in Int. Geosci. and Remote Sens. Symp. (IGARSS'87), Ann Arbor (MI),18-2 May 1987, pp. 643-648, 1987.
[5] D. F. Parkhurst, "Internal leaf structure: a three-dimensional perspective," in On the economy of plant form and function (T. J. Givnish, ed.), pp. 215-249, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[6] K. F. Palmer and D. Williams, "Optical properties of water in the near infrared," J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 64, pp. 1107-1110, 1974.
[7] S. Jacquemoud and F. Baret, "PROSPECT: a model of leaf optical properties spectra," Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 34, pp. 75-91, 1990.
[8] S. Jacquemoud, S. L. Ustin, J. Verdebout, G. Schmuck, G. Andreoli and B. Hosgood, "PROSPECT Redux," Summaries of the Fifth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop: AVIRIS Workshop, Green, R. O., ed., Pasadena, CA, January 23-26, 1995, vol. 95-1, pp. 99-104, 1995.
[9] T. Richter and L. Fukshansky, "Authentic in vivo absorption spectra for chlorophyll in leaves as derived from in situ and in vitro measurements," Photochem. Photobiol, vol. 59, pp. 237-247, 1994.
[10] Y. Govaerts and M. M. Verstraete, "Applications of the L-systems to canopy reflectance modeling in a Monte Carlo ray tracing technique," in Fractals in Geoscience and Remote Sensing (EU/EARSeL, ed.), (Ispra, Italy), in press, 1994.
[11] Y. Govaerts and M. M. Verstaete, "Evaluation of the capability of BRDF models to retrieve structural information on the observed target as described by a tridimensional ray tracing code," in The European Symposium on Satellite Remote Sensing (EUROPTO, ed.), (Rome, Italy), pp. 9-20, 1994.
[12] M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics. Oxford: Pergamon press, second ea., 1964.
[13] T. C. Vogelmann, J. F. Bornman and S. Josserand, "Photosynthetic light gradients and spectral regime within leaves of Medicago sativa," Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., vol. B323, pp. 411-421, 1989.
[14] T. C. Vogelmann, "Plant tissue optics," Annul Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 44, pp. 231-251, 1993.
[15] W. A. Allen, "Transmission of isotropic light across a dielectric surface in two and three dimensions," J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 63, pp. 664-666, 1973.
[16] L. Grant, C. S. T. Daughtry and V. C. Vanderbilt, "Polarized and specular reflectance variation with leaf surface features," Physiol Plant, vol. 88, pp. 1-9, 1993.
[17] T. W. Brakke, J. A. Smith and J. M. Harnden, "Bidirectional scattering of light from tree leaves," Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 29, pp. 175-183, 1989.
[18] T. W. Brakke, "Specular and diffuse components of radiation scattered by leaves," Agr. For. Meteorol., vol. 71, pp. 283-295, 1994.